The Recording Website Forum ArchiveBoard Message |
Here's where there's a lot of confusion |
[ Follow Ups ] [ The Recording Website Message Board Archives (The Early Years) ] [ The Recording Forums ] Posted by
Silent Bob on June 30, 2000 at 02:32:05:
In Reply to: Digital vs. Analogue mixers posted by Juz on June 29, 2000 at 22:28:59:
When it comes to signal processing, analogue is unsurpassable when it comes to quality. Digital may be more precise but the sound is actually degraded more. The problems people associate with "analogue" are only enherant in analogue tape, not the format itself. Most professional mixing and mastering studios (I'm talking indrustrial here, not audiophile) use analogue processors and mixers. Take for instance, my cheap Mackie 1202 I use for small clubs. It's frequency response goes up to 100KHz while most digital mixers in the lower/mid price range will only have a bandwidth up to 22KHz or so (which will be extremely distorted from 11KHz up). With my mackie, distortion doesn't become a problem until the audio is well beyond audible range (by the way, this is why some people say digital is harsh sounding, it's dues to some ususual types of distortion in the high frequencies).
You can get a much better analogue mixer for the same price. You just won't have the same precision or bells & whistles.) Of course, when I record, I concentrate on basic quality, not the bonuses. Say for instance, I'd rather use a good mechanical reverb that can't be adjusted than a very bad reverb with lots of adjustable features on my recordings.
Now, on the other hand, if you can link all your equipment digitally (using lightpipe or s/pdif or another direct interface) then it may be beneficial to get a digital mixer to avoid more convertions. If you're linking your digital equipment with analogue lines like XLR or 1/4", then a digital mixer would be pointless IMHO. Or if you can even hook the output on the digital mixer to your mixdown deck digitally, then that may be worth it since you'll bypass an a/d-d/a conversion. Really, the worst thing you can do to your sound is switch formats. The majority of digital's problems are from the conversion itself and not the storage or processing all though that has a lot to do with it too. Another personal opinion (sorry to ramble, I know you've probably heard enough of my OPINION) is keep your audio to one or less format conversions. That is, if you start analogue and convert to digital, then stay digital. If you start digital and convert to analogue, stay analogue.
Hope I didn't consufe you too much.
- yes, and you are a little confused too digital user 10:56:45 6/30/00 (37)
- You left yourself wide open on this one. So I guess I'll burst your bubble and hope for the nasty response. Puke 20:01:45 6/30/00 (21)
- Re: You left yourself wide open on this one. So I guess I'll burst your bubble and hope for the nasty response. vomit 04:30:02 7/01/00 (20)
- 44.1 is the sampling freq. on cd's now. as it was 20 years ago on lazer disks.. Puke 11:13:16 7/02/00 (9)
- Re: 44.1 is the sampling freq. on cd's now. as it was 20 years ago on lazer disks.. lazer disc 16:51:38 7/02/00 (8)
- try that again Silent Bob 02:58:40 7/03/00 (4)
- Re: try that again looks worse than it is! 08:06:13 7/05/00 (0)
- I actually didn't know the waveform goes to hell that soon. That's worse than I thought. Puke 09:58:53 7/03/00 (0)
- I would have loved to do that post but am not good enough with my graphics program. Puke 09:56:25 7/03/00 (1)
- that'll take me a while Silent Bob 14:33:37 7/03/00 (0)
- check this out Silent Bob 02:55:56 7/03/00 (1)
- don't read this one SB 02:59:55 7/03/00 (0)
- You must have skipped some words while reading my post (or the webdude deleted something) Puke 23:48:17 7/02/00 (0)
- you didn't read my post correctly Silent Bob 19:46:11 7/01/00 (3)
- You, didn't take my post correctly either. Puke 10:50:46 7/02/00 (2)
- wait a minute! Silent Bob 14:30:45 7/02/00 (1)
- Absolutely Puke 15:29:29 7/02/00 (0)
- Re: ll burst your bubble and hope for the nasty response. db 13:32:55 7/01/00 (5)
- Please translate that to english. I don't get your point. Puke 10:42:52 7/02/00 (4)
- that's only 'cos you can't read. I got it. . 16:44:39 7/02/00 (0)
- By the way, the main board boss chewed me out for being a puke. What's that about? Puke 11:14:47 7/02/00 (2)
- Re: board boss chew out ..A new guy just being stupid ...sorry. db 11:59:45 7/02/00 (1)
- Not so stupid I enjoyed the thread!(e) Kevin 12:54:08 7/02/00 (0)
- that's true but.. Silent Bob 17:15:19 6/30/00 (14)
- that's true but.. same guy 17:48:42 6/30/00 (13)
- dude, who's world are you in. They do to have that stuff in analog. Puke 21:04:54 7/05/00 (1)
- Re: dude, who's world are you in. They do to have that stuff in analog. um, the REAL world?? i must've fried your last two brain cells... 11:07:20 7/06/00 (0)
- more on that Silent Bob 19:58:01 6/30/00 (10)
- Re: web-dude Juzzer 02:11:31 7/03/00 (1)
- Re: web-dude Juzzer 02:14:42 7/03/00 (0)
- Re: more on that Juzzer 01:53:39 7/03/00 (7)
- About your neve V. Puke 21:19:17 7/05/00 (2)
- Re: Sampling rate Juzzer 22:04:30 7/05/00 (1)
- I've been working on it Silent Bob 01:03:51 7/06/00 (0)
- good questions Silent Bob 03:17:33 7/03/00 (3)
- Re: good questions Juzzer 03:32:56 7/03/00 (0)
- Re: good questions Juzzer 03:29:36 7/03/00 (1)
- yes Silent Bob 01:26:35 7/04/00 (0)