 Board Message |
Re: I guess... |
|
Board Message |
Re: I guess... |
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Recording Website Message Board ] [ FAQ ] Posted by maury on June 09, 2000 at 14:03:04:
In Reply to: I guess... posted by JC on June 09, 2000 at 13:49:27:
That's an interesting point - I have to remember (and should inform you guys) that I am unfortunately trying to get a "bang for the buck" solution here, and maybe I should establish a "ball park" for all to compare against. The only comp I have ever used is (are you sitting down for this one) the Alesis NanoComp. I know, not every engineer's dream, but I AM ready to upgrade. I won't say I love the nano, but I think I use it in such little doses that I haven't allowed it to do much damage to my mixes. "Less is more" is definitely my motto - even with effects, but that's another story altogether. Now knowing what comp I'm comparing everything to, would any of you like to change your answers? I did record a solo album on my MD8, with the equipment list cosisting mostly of an AT4033 & Rode NT1 for mics, the NanoComp, Behringer Virtualizer (not pro), Martin OM28VR acoustic, Yamaha bass, and acoustic drums mic'd with the old "combo" mic package - a few 57s, 58s & the 2 condensers. If any of you would like a complimentary copy of this disc - please step forward! It would probably help you get an idea what my ears are like, and you might just like the songs. It's the least I could do for all the help. Thanks!
Maury
- Re: I guess... Percy 18:24:12 6/09/00 (1)
- Re: I guess... Bill V 12:30:59 6/10/00 (0)